Legal Opinion

Transpac Drilling Venture v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 28, 1995No. 90-131TPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARGOLIS, Judge.

This tax case comes before the court on both plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment and defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment concerning plaintiffs claim for readjustment of partnership items.

Transpac Drilling Venture 1983-2 (“Trans-pac 83-2”), one of approximately 72 Transpac partnerships, filed timely partnership level returns in 1983 and 1984. Transpac 83-2 was a Delaware limited partnership comprised of two general partners and approximately 35 limited partners. Transpac 83-2 reported substantial losses for both years. Subsequent to the filing of its…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Frank Lyon Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. Rice's Toyota World, Inc. (Formerly Rice Auto Sales, Inc.) v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  5. Surloff v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Keener v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  2. Prati v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  3. Transpac Drilling Venture, 1983-2 by James M. Dobbins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  4. McGann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  5. Schell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API