Legal Opinion

State v. Roberts

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 7, 1989No. 87-060PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.

The defendant, Alan O. Roberts, was indicted by a Coos County Grand Jury for witness tampering, pursuant to RSA 641:5, 1(b), for telling his estranged wife that their twelve-year-old daughter would not be returned to her unless his wife agreed not to testify against him on a pending sexual assault charge. The defendant was convicted following a jury trial and sentenced by the Court (Morrill, J.). The defendant now appeals.

The defendant challenges his conviction on two grounds: (1) that the trial court erred in failing to suppress certain of his statements; and (2) that the trial court erred…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  5. State v. DellorfanoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SmartSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  2. State v. JaromaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  3. State v. SaulnierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  4. State v. MacArthurSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  5. State v. CaplinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API