State v. MacArthur
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.
The defendant, Arthur “Jay” MacArthur, appeals his conviction for class A kidnapping, RSA 633:1 (1986), and first degree assault, RSA 631:1 (1986 & Supp. 1993), after a jury trial in Superior Court (Morrill, J.). He argues that the trial court should have instructed the jury that prior inconsistent statements made by the victim could not be used substantively, and that there was insufficient evidence of serious bodily injury to the victim. We reverse and remand.
On July 5,1992, the defendant’s girlfriend (victim) was admitted to the New London Hospital emergency room with dried blood on her…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. SantanaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- State v. CoppolaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- State v. KennaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- State v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- State v. GouletSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. PepinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- State v. PelkeySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
- In Re David H.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- State v. DemerittSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- State v. ScognamiglioSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.