Legal Opinion

Walker v. United States

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided June 2, 2004No. 5:00-cv-01112PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MUNSON, Senior District Judge.

Petitioners bring this motion to alter or amend judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) seeking reconsideration of this court’s order of February 11, 2004, which denied petitioners’ § 2255 motion. A motion to reconsider a § 2255 ruling shall be filed no later than ten days after entry of the challenged order. Williams v. United States, 984 F.2d 28 (2d Cir.1993). In the instant case, the motion was timely filed within the ten day limitation period.

A Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend a judgment should only be granted where the court has…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Robert J. McCarthy v. John Manson, Commissioner of Corrections of the State of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. World University Inc., Santa Barbara Center CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Eduardo Orozco-Prada, Humberto Orozco-Prada, Paul Forand and Mahlon ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miller v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API