Legal Opinion

In Re Ronald Kirsh in Re Paula Kirsh, Debtors. Eugene Parks Law Corporation Defined Benefit Pension Plan v. Ronald Kirsh Paula Kirsh

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 31, 1992No. 91-55701PublishedCited by 141 opinions

1Per curiam

Ronald and Paula Kirsh (the Kirshes) filed for bankruptcy, and the Eugene Parks Deferred Benefit Pension Plan (the Plan) asked that the Kirshes’ debt to it be found nondischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A). The bankruptcy court denied that request because it found that the Plan had not relied on the Kirshes’ false representations. The district court affirmed the bankruptcy court. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

Eugene Parks (Parks) is an attorney who established the Plan to provide for his retirement. Parks had been practicing law for twenty years and the area of his practice was business…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. In Re John Houtman and Gladys Irene Houtman, Bankrupts. John Houtman and Gladys Irene Houtman v. Edgar F. Mann and Edna M. Mann, Creditors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  3. In Re Michael Duane Mullet, Debtor. First Bank of Colorado Springs, a State Banking Corporation v. Michael Duane MulletCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  4. Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Bankr. L. Rep. P 74,355 in Re Robert Britton, Debtor. Robert Britton v. Mary PriceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by141 opinions

  1. Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. In Re Amjad I. Eashai, Debtor. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Amjad I. EashaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. In the Matter of John E. Mayer and Deborah Mayer, Debtors-Appellants v. Spanel International Ltd. And Bank One-Rockford, N.A., Creditors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  4. In Re Edwin Leo Vann, Debtor. City Bank & Trust Co. v. Edwin Leo VannCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  5. In Re: Sateesh Apte, Debtor. Sateesh Apte v. Romesh Japra, M.D., F.A.C.C., Inc., a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API