Legal Opinion

People v. Taylor

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 3, 1993No. 3-92-0487, 3-92-0488 consPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stouder

The defendants, David Londergon and Amy Taylor, were each charged by information with unlawful possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 56V2, par. 1401(a)(ll)), unlawful possession of a controlled substance (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 56V2, par. 1402(a)(ll)), and unlawful possession of cannabis (111. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 56V2, par. 704(a)). In a consolidated proceeding, the defendants successfully moved to suppress the drug evidence as the product of an illegal search and seizure. The People appeal. We affirm.

Amy Taylor and David Londergon each…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. SparksAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  2. People v. ErvinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. People v. LeFloreAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  4. People v. BowerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  5. People v. HoekstraAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API