Legal Opinion

Anemone v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 4, 2011No. Docket 08-2646-cvPublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff-appellant Louis Anemone (“Anemone”) was, until May 2003, the Director of Security and a Deputy Executive Director of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“MTA”). He alleges that his former employer and the individual MTA Defendants, Peter Kalikow, Katherine Lapp, Gary Dellaverson, and Matthew Sansverie (collectively, “Defendants”), took a series of adverse employment actions against him, culminating in his termination, as a result of his protected speech highlighting the MTA’s perceived failure to address his corruption concerns. He claims that they…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Garcetti v. CeballosSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Rankin v. McPhersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. Analytical Surveys, Inc. v. Tonga Partners, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  2. Greene v. DoruffCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  3. Nagle v. MarronCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  4. Raymond Smith v. County of SuffolkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  5. Trant v. Medicolegal InvestigationsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API