Legal Opinion
Vernon Irrigation Co. v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
Decided March 8, 1895No. 19388PublishedCited by 30 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
When this case was originally submitted for decision an opinion was prepared by Mr. Commissioner Temple, which is now adopted by the court:
“ Plaintiff, a corporation, begins this suit, averring that it is the owner of a tract of land which is riparian to Los Angeles river, to enjoin defendants from diverting water-.
“Plaintiff avers that the flow of water over its natural bed renders its lands fertile and valuable, and that it is entitled to have the waters flow as they have been accustomed to flow.
“ That defendants claim an interest in the water adverse to plaintiff; that the claims…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Modoc Land & Live Stock Co. v. BoothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Brownsville v. CavazosSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Feliz v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Stevenson v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
3Cited by30 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. City of San FernandoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Bathgate v. IrvineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- State Ex Rel. Martinez v. City of Las VegasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
- Anaheim Union Water Co. v. Fuller.California Supreme Court · 1907
- City of San Diego v. Cuyamaca Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.