J. D. Randall Co. v. Fogelsong Mach. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western Division of the Southern District of Ohio; Howard C. Hollister, Judge. Suit in equity by the Fogelsong Machine Company against the J. D. Randall Company. From an order affirming the report of the master on an accounting, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
SATER, District Judge.
After the validity of the plaintiff’s (ap-pellee’s) patent had been sustained by this court (203 Fed. 41, 121 C. C. A. 377), a special master was appointed to state an account of profits and damages. The trial court affirmed his finding that the plaintiff, through the defendant’s (appellant’s) competition, lost four sales of its machine to the Bingham Harness Company, the Voss-Barbee Manufacturing Company, the Southern Oak Feather Company, and the Minnesota Harness Company, and that defendant should consequently pay to plaintiff $100 as profits and $3,480 as damages, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mutual Life Insurance v. HillmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Steketee v. KimmMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Worth v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa · 1892
- J. D. Randall Co. v. Foglesong Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mattox v. News Syndicate Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- United States Frumentum Co. v. LauhoffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
- Dickinson v. O. & W. THUM CO.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925
- Mattox v. News Syndicate Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949