Legal Opinion

Steketee v. Kimm

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1882PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to Kent. Case. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff, who is a druggist in Grand Tiapids, sued defendants for a libel published in the Dutch language in a newspaper having a large circulation among the Hollanders in that part of the State, and recovered damages. Defendants set up several errors which, so far as material, will be considered.

The libel consisted of an article asserting that plaintiff ■sold what he claimed to be genuine Netherlands Haarlem Oil, and that defendants doubting it, had sent one of his labels to Haarlem, and received from the rector of the gymnasium there a letter, which is given at length, stating that •a…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Park v. Detroit Free Press Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. MillonasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Morse v. Times-Republican Printing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. American Cooperative Serum Ass'n v. Anchor Serum Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
  5. Phillips v. United States Benevolent SocietyMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API