State v. Viergutz
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SHERAN, Chief Justice.
This is a pretrial appeal by the state, pursuant to R. 29.03, subd. 1, R.Crim.P., from an order of the district court dismissing an amended complaint in a felony prosecution. The issue on appeal focuses on the meaning of R. 17.06, subd. 4(3), R.Crim.P., re the appropriate procedures a prosecutor must follow in order to file an amended complaint when the original complaint is dismissed for lack of probable cause. The district court held that when a complaint is dismissed for lack of probable cause and the state, not needing to rely on any newly discovered evidence, wants…
2Cited by11 opinions
- State v. PetteeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. DwireSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. BonafideCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. GroseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. WhitleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.