Legal Opinion

State v. Viergutz

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 4, 1980No. 50713PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHERAN, Chief Justice.

This is a pretrial appeal by the state, pursuant to R. 29.03, subd. 1, R.Crim.P., from an order of the district court dismissing an amended complaint in a felony prosecution. The issue on appeal focuses on the meaning of R. 17.06, subd. 4(3), R.Crim.P., re the appropriate procedures a prosecutor must follow in order to file an amended complaint when the original complaint is dismissed for lack of probable cause. The district court held that when a complaint is dismissed for lack of probable cause and the state, not needing to rely on any newly discovered evidence, wants…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. PetteeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  2. State v. DwireSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. State v. BonafideCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  4. State v. GroseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. State v. WhitleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API