Legal Opinion
State v. Whitley
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 6, 2002No. C0-02-623PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.
The state charged respondent with fourth-degree criminal sexual conduct and failure to register as a predatory sex offender. The district court dismissed the charge of fourth-degree criminal sexual conduct because it concluded the complaint lacked probable cause based on its interpretation of the definition of “force” in the criminal-sexual-conduct statute. The state requested leave to amend the complaint and filed an amended complaint three days later. The state filed a second amended complaint seven days after filing the first amended complaint.
The district…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. BrouilletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. NerzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. PetteeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. AubolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. GradisharCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006