Legal Opinion
State v. Grose
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 16, 1987No. C4-86-1133PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
The State appeals from an order of the trial court denying the State’s motion for an extension of time to refile indictments or a complaint against respondent. We affirm.
FACTS
On May 13, 1986, this court affirmed a trial court’s December 13, 1985, dismissal of grand jury indictments against respondent for aiding and abetting perjury. State v. Grose, 387 N.W.2d 182 (Minn.Ct.App.1986) (Grose I). We agreed with the trial court that several violations of the criminal procedure rules and of respondent’s constitutional rights had been made by the Scott County Attorney, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. GroseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. ViergutzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. ChamberlainCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. DwireSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. DwireCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. RoersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Hoyt Investment Co. v. Bloomington Commerce & Trade Center AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. DwireCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987