Legal Opinion

Goeman v. Allstate Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 19, 2006No. A06-425PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

Appellants David and Charlotte Goeman and Trade Lake Mutual Insurance Company (Trade Lake) challenge the grant of summary judgment to respondent Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate), determining that under the “closest to the risk” doctrine, Trade Lake was primarily liable for injuries sustained by a child guest who was bitten by the Goemans’ dog while at their cabin. On appeal, Trade Lake argues that because both policies were equally close to the risk, the policies provide concurrent coverage. We agree, and reverse and remand. We further reject Allstate’s claim that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Integrity Mutual Insurance v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Garrick v. Northland Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  4. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Auto Owners Insurance Co. v. Northstar Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. GREAT WEST CAS. v. General Cas. Co. of WisconsinDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API