Legal Opinion

Dowd v. Schoening

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1955No. 7318PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUARK, Judge.

The respondent, Dowd, had judgment against defendant, A. H. Schoening, on a purchase money note. Upon execution under such judgment the sheriff levied upon the property here in question, to-wit, one Farmall tractor with plows, disks and other equipment, and one McCormick hay baler and side delivery rake. Appellant, Florence D. Schoening, wife of the judgment debtor, filed claim as owner of the property so seized under the provisions of Section 513.130, RSMo 1949, V.A.M.S. and related sections.

The Schoenings lived at Paducah, Kentucky. The husband had been a railroad engineer but…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Freeman v. BerberichSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. O'Brien v. RindskopfSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  3. Dawes v. StarrettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  4. Littig v. Urbauer-Atwood Heating Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  5. McCoy v. HyattSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maul v. FilimonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  2. Sanfilippo v. BolleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  3. Tabor ex rel. Tabor v. HahsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API