Tabor ex rel. Tabor v. Hahs
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CLEMENS, Commissioner.
The plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment after the jury found for the defendant under plaintiff’s humanitarian submission. Plaintiff complains that the trial court erred by omitting a necessary element of plaintiff’s verdict-directing instruction.
The plaintiff was a pedestrian and the defendant was a motorist. Plaintiff’s evidence was that while he was walking diagonally across Gravois Road in St. Louis County, defendant drove up from behind and ran into him, breaking his leg. Plaintiff’s evidence tended to show that defendant was inattentive, and that he could…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Banks v. Morris CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. DuncanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- Tinsley v. Massman Const. Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Dowd v. SchoeningMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
- McClintock v. PriceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
3Cited by1 opinion
- Curators of the University of Missouri Ex Rel. Shell-Con, Inc. v. Nebraska Prestressed Concrete Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975