Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Rosenthal

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHenry Clay Greenberg, J.

Defendants move to dismiss for insufficiency the complaint in this minority stockholders’ derivative action ox', alternatively, to strike certain paragraphs therefrom. Plaintiffs seek to set aside an agreement made in 1956 between the corporation and its president, and approved by the board of directors, whereby the corporation placed in escrow the sum of $372,256 (the equivalent of $1 for each share of its 372,256 outstanding shares) to be invested and reinvested, and paid to the president after the termination of his employment on December 31, 1965.

The gist of the first cause of action is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kalmanash v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Gerdes v. ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Weinberger v. QuinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  4. Weinberger v. QuinnNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Walsh v. Van Ameringen-Haebler, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sucher v. Radiant Briar Pipe Co.New York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API