Legal Opinion
Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Insurance v. Whiddon
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 11, 1953No. 34471PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, C. J.
It is contended that the superior court erred in affirming the award because the award was equivocal, uncertain, not positive, and defective in substance as well as in form, in that it directed the employer “and/or” the insurer to pay compensation to the claimant. The award plainly states that the claimant is entitled to compensation, and there is no question as to whom he was employed by at the time of his injury, nor as to his employer’s being insured by Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Insurance Company at the time of the injury for which he was awarded compensation. Code § 114-607…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Austin Bros. Bridge Co. v. WhitmireCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Blue Bell Globe Manufacturing Co. v. BairdCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- American Mutual Liability Insurance v. HamptonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Scandrett v. Talmadge Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Bethlehem Steel Co. v. DempseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Shaw Industries, Inc. v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Bethlehem Steel Co. v. DempseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. MotesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960