Legal Opinion
Lee v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 4, 1925No. 16076PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBboyles, C. J.
The evidence tending to connect the accused with the offense charged was wholly circumstantial, and was not sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt. The verdict, therefore, was contrary to law and the evidence, and the trial judge erred in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Luke and Bloodworlh, JJ., concur.
2Cited by25 opinions
- Blue Bell Globe Manufacturing Co. v. BairdCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Fralish v. Royal Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Keeter v. CLIFTON MFG. CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
- Mustanen v. Diamond Coal & Coke Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1936
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.