Immega v. City of Elkhorn
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.
The alleged invalidity of the tax, because of which plaintiff seeks to recover herein $66.61, which he paid under protest, represents taxes which he claims were unlawfully levied in 1945 by the county of Walworth (hereinafter referred to as “cbunty” ) and city of Elkhorn against his property. The alleged invalidity is based upon plaintiff’s claim that the Walworth county board was unauthorized to make a levy in the year 1945 until, upon first making up a budget of proposed revenues and expenditures in the ensuing year, it deducted from the amount to be raised by levying the tax all…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re BlissSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Bingham v. Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- El Reno Wholesale Grocery Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Grubb v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- People Ex Rel. Toman v. 110 South Dearborn Street Building Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Barth v. Monroe Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
- Fiore v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Blue Top Motel, Inc. v. City of Stevens PointWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- (1973), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1973
- Opinion No. Oag 16-85, (1985), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.