Legal Opinion

Immega v. City of Elkhorn

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1948PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

The alleged invalidity of the tax, because of which plaintiff seeks to recover herein $66.61, which he paid under protest, represents taxes which he claims were unlawfully levied in 1945 by the county of Walworth (hereinafter referred to as “cbunty” ) and city of Elkhorn against his property. The alleged invalidity is based upon plaintiff’s claim that the Walworth county board was unauthorized to make a levy in the year 1945 until, upon first making up a budget of proposed revenues and expenditures in the ensuing year, it deducted from the amount to be raised by levying the tax all…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re BlissSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Bingham v. Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  3. El Reno Wholesale Grocery Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Grubb v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. People Ex Rel. Toman v. 110 South Dearborn Street Building Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Barth v. Monroe Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
  2. Fiore v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Blue Top Motel, Inc. v. City of Stevens PointWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  4. (1973), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1973
  5. Opinion No. Oag 16-85, (1985), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API