Legal Opinion

Briggs & Turivas, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 2, 1931No. K-50PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOTH, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff, an Illinois corporation, sues to recover an allowed overpayment of its income and profits taxes for the year 1918. The facts, not in dispute, disclose that the plaintiff on June 15, 1919', paid to the collector of internal revenue for the First collection district of Illinois $15,408.09 income and profits taxes for 1918. On February 8, 1924, the plaintiff paid to the same collector $57,355.68 additional income and profits taxes assessed against it for the year 1918. Thereafter on February 11, 1924, plaintiff filed with the collector a claim for refund and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. De Arnaud v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Shipman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1883
  3. James Stewart & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Helvetia Milk Condensing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  2. American Potash Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
  3. Aluminum Co. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1938
  4. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
  5. Bianchi v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API