Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1939No. 27765PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The issue raised by the demurrer to the petition is whether the Industrial Commission had jurisdiction to consider the application for reconsideration filed by claimant Harold McDonnell on May 4, 1939. It is conceded in the instant case that more than ten years had elapsed since the disability is alleged to have begun and that no compensation had been awarded by the commission during such period. The limitation clause in Section 1465-86, General Code, reads in part as follows: "* * * ten years after the injury in cases in which no compensation ever has been awarded." If this limitation in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Culver v. People ex rel. KocherspergerIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Gaston v. LamkinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  4. State ex rel. Miller v. LeichIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  5. City of St. Louis v. R. J. Gunning Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Beier Glass Co. v. BrundigeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  2. Jacobs v. Teledyne, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State Ex Rel. Oberlin v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. Jacobs v. Teledyne, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State ex rel. Anderson v. DuffyOhio Supreme Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API