Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Oberlin v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 1961No. 6455PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuffey, P. J.

This is an appeal from the granting of a writ of mandamus against The Industrial Commission on an occupational disease claim. A careful statement of the facts is important to the issues raised.

Appellee-claimant filed a claim based on alleged mercury poisoning arising from her employment between November, 1949 and May, 1952. The claim was filed January 9, 1956. The Regional Board reversed the Administrator, and on August 21, 1956, entered an order allowing the claim. The employer appealed to the Commission, and on December 31, 1956, the Commission entered an order denying the appeal. On…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932
  2. State v. Ohio Stove Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1941
  4. State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
  5. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Meek v. SchwanbeckOhio Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. State Ex Rel. Prayner v. Industrial Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. State, Ex Rel. Moore v. KellerOhio Court of Appeals · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API