Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Smith

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 22, 1990No. 587PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

The instant appeal raises the issue of the applicability of 18 Pa.Cons.Stat.Ann. § 110 (Purdon 1983) which sets forth the circumstances under which a prosecution is barred by a former prosecution for a different offense. Since we conclude that section 110 which embodies constitutional double jeopardy principles has no application to this case, we affirm the judgment of sentence.

Appellant Gary Smith sold approximately one pound of marijuana to a state police informant and two state troopers on March 9,1987. This purchase of drugs, along with other information gathered in the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. CampanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MicklosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Commonwealth v. PerilloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. SchmotzerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Commonwealth v. BellezzaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. HunterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API