Commonwealth v. Micklos
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, Judge:
We considered this case en banc primarily to determine whether the Commonwealth may appeal from an order of court which granted a criminal defendant’s suppression motion and concurrently dismissed all charges filed against that defendant, thereby preventing the Commonwealth from pursuing its right to appeal the adverse rulings of a suppression court. After reviewing the circumstances of this case in light of the applicable law, we conclude that the challenged Com*565monwealth appeal does not implicate principles of double jeopardy.
On April 24, 1993, at approximately 10:10 p.m.,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Fong Foo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Commonwealth v. OrtegaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. JohonosonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. PettewaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. VargasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. LongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.