Legal Opinion

Spies v. Caruso

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 2, 1925No. 8826PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaiborne, J.

This is a damage suit against an alleged purchaser of merchandise for failing to receive same.

Plaintiff alleged that he made the following contract with the defendant:

'6/25/20.

J. Caruso.

Dear Sir:

This is to certify that we have today booked you for twenty-five tubs of butter at 66%^ to be taken out as needed until December 31, 1920.

This to be binding must be signed by both parties.

(Signed) Joseph Caruso.

A. S. Spies. E.”

That the defendant took out only two of said tubs, and refused to take any more; that after demand upon defendant and refusal by him, plaintiff, on January 18, 1921, sold said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lafourche Transportation Co. v. PughSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
  2. McCarty v. StrausSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1869
  3. F. G. Barriere & Co. v. FortierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1871
  4. Phelps v. HodgeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1851

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pitre v. PeltierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Well v. Sabine State Bank & Trust Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Succession of McCrocklinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
  4. Succession of McCrocklinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
  5. Succession of McCrocklinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API