Legal Opinion · Dissent

Succession of McCrocklin

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 15, 1962No. 45546Published

1DissentHamlin, Justice

In my dissent from the majority opinion on original hearing, I set forth the condition of the pleadings and stated that the burden was upon Jack S. McCrocklin and Margaret Virginia “Ginger” Johnson to show the authority for Jack S. McCrocklin’s agency. In Footnote 1, I cited Pitre v. Peltier, La.App., 122 So.2d 867, and Spies v. Caruso, 1 La.App. 544, and authorities cited therein.

I am still of the belief that the only evidence of Mrs. Delia S. McCrocklin’s intention or attempt to make the donation which was offered was the hearsay testimony of Jack S. McCrocklin, which is not corroborated.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. De Rouen v. AiavolasitiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899
  3. Baer Bros. v. TerrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  4. O. E. Haring, Inc. v. Boylan's Private Police, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Pitre v. PeltierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API