Legal Opinion

Zamatha v. Harak

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 1, 1948PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion for a new trial based upon the fact that the judge who tried the case died after judgment but before an appeal to this court could be perfected. The action was brought to recover damages for breach of a promise of marriage. There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant obtained an order extending the time within which to file an appeal to this court, but the judge who presided at the trial died before that extension had expired or an appeal had been filed. Thereafter, the defendant filed the motion from the denial of which this…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gannon v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
  2. Boardman v. BurlingameSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  3. Parsons v. PlattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
  4. Fitzgerald v. SavinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  5. Kliarsky v. Eastern Greyhound Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rossignol v. Danbury School of Aeronautics, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  2. Rutt v. RocheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  3. Stocker v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  4. Lane v. Town of GraftonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  5. Cheney v. StrasburgerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API