State v. Fuqua
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtEeviN, J.
The defendant does not question the propriety of the admission of any of the evidence of the State’s witness, Deputy Sheriff Fowlkes. In consequence, the testimony as to reports to law enforcement officers concerning the activities of the accused is governed by the rule which prevails in this jurisdiction that where hearsay is admitted without objection, it may be considered with the other evidence and given any evidentiary value which it may possess. Maley v. Furniture Co., 214 N.C. 589, 200 S.E. 438.
The solitary assignment of error made by the defendant is that the trial judge erred in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- State v. . MeyersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- State v. BarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Maley v. . Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Maley v. Thomasville Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. BaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.