Legal Opinion

Inhabitants of Camden v. Inhabitants of Warren

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 18, 1964Published

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

All parties appearing in this case agree to all material facts and upon their request this action is reported to this court for determination. M. R. C. P., Rule 72(b).

AGREED STATEMENT

“This question involves the pauper settlement of one Woodrow W. Carter, a minor at the time this action was commenced. The action was brought by the Town of Camden against the Town of Warren for the recovery of $396.34 expended for pauper supplies for the said Woodrow W. Carter. After the commencement of the action the State of Maine,----requested to be made a party defendant in this matter. It is agreed that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Town of Plainville v. Town of MilfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  2. Inhabitants of Carthage v. Inhabitants of CantonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1903
  3. City of Augusta v. Inhabitants of MexicoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1944
  4. Inhabitants of Dennysville v. Ihabitants of TrescottSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1849
  5. Inhabitants of Thomaston v. Inhabitants of GreenbushSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API