Inhabitants of Thomaston v. Inhabitants of Greenbush
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
On report. Action to recover for pauper supplies furnished by the plaintiff town to three minor children of one Alden B. Partridge. An agreed statement of facts was filed and the case was then reported to the Law Court for determination. By leave of court, the Attorney General was permitted to appear for the State.
1Opinion of the CourtCornish, J.
Action of assumpsit for pauper supplies furnished three minor children of Alden B. Partridge. From the agreed statement of facts it appears that Partridge, having a pauper settlement in Greenbush, moved with his wife and children to Thomaston and was living there with his family in 1899, when, not having acquired a pauper settlement in Thomaston, he abandoned his family and went to Massachusetts where he has since resided. His wife obtained a divorce from him on March 20, 1901, and the care and custody of all the children including the three involved here were decreed to her and they have…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Bjornquist v. Boston & A. R.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1918
- Lafleur Et Ux. v. ZelenkoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
- Inhabitants of Guilford v. Inhabitants of MonsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1936
- Inhabitants of Camden v. Inhabitants of WarrenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1964