Legal Opinion

Spaulding v. Mott

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1906No. 20,572PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From Tipton Circuit Court; James F. Elliott, Judge. Gravel road proceedings by Asa E. Mott and others, against which Allen F. Spaulding and others remonstrate. From an order establishing such road, remonstrants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

This proceeding was brought by appellees before the Board of Commissioners of the County of Tipton at the June term, 1904, of the said board, under the act of 1903 (Acts 1903, p. 255) to improve by grading, draining and graveling a public highway in said county which runs parallel with the west line of said county and one-fourth of a mile therefrom. Appellants appeared and filed separate remonstrances, and such proceedings were had that the board ordered the improvement to be made. On appeal to the court below certain assessments were modified and damages were allowed to two of the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. State Board of Tax Commissioners v. HollidayIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. City of Terre Haute v. Evansville & Terre Haute RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Adams v. City of ShelbyvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. City of Indianapolis v. NavinIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Gilson v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Loomis v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Strange v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Smith v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Edwards v. CooperIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Fender v. PhillipsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API