Legal Opinion

Amco Insurance v. Beck

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 20, 1996No. 76,290PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Abbott, J.:

The trial court held that the business exclusion in the insureds’ homeowner’s policy did not preclude liability coverage concerning a claim made against the insureds arising out of the insureds’ teenage daughter’s babysitting activities. We agree.

AMCO Insurance Company sold Gerald and Christa Beck a homeowner’s insurance policy which included liability coverage for the Beck family, including the Becks’ 15-year-old daughter, Teri Beck. While Teri was babysitting John and Susan Moran’s two children, one of the children, Courtney Moran,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Catholic Diocese of Dodge City v. RaymerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. Stanley v. American Fire & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. Fadden v. Cambridge Mutual Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Harris v. RichardsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  5. Spivey v. Safeco InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. BancInsure, Inc. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  2. Conner v. Occidental Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  3. Springer v. Erie Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  4. Hartford Fire Insurance v. Vita Craft Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2012
  5. Estes v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API