Legal Opinion

Conner v. Occidental Fire & Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 9, 2006No. 92,286PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Allegrucci, J.:

Mike Conner filed a claim with his commercial insurers, Occidental Fire & Casualty Company of North Carolina (Occidental) and Wilshire Insurance Company (Wilshire) (collectively insurers), for damages to a farm trailer that collapsed when being loaded with grain. The insurers denied coverage; Conner sued. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court concluded that Conner sustained an insured loss, the insurers failed to conduct a good faith investigation, and Conner was entitled to attorney fees. The trial court set the case…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  2. Unrau v. Kidron Bethel Retirement Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  3. State Ex Rel. Stovall v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  4. Brumley v. LeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  5. Bracken v. Dixon Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. SHAMBERG, JOHNSON & BERGMAN v. OliverSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. Central Natural Resources, Inc. v. Davis Operating Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  3. Wichita Clinic, P.A. v. LouisCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  4. Idbeis v. Wichita Surgical Specialists, P.A.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  5. Osterhaus v. TothCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API