Howard Meeks v. United States

WISDOM, Circuit Judge.

„ „ , TT . . . ,. , ■■ Appellant, Howard Meeks, was mdicted and found guilty of the offense of receivmg a stolen motor vehicle moving m interstate commerce, knowing it to have been stolen. 18 U.S.C.A. § 2313. He appeals on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict.

After the government rested, ap-' pellant moved for a judgment of acquit-The court denied the motion. Thereafter appellant introduced evidence ™ his behalf but did not renew his mo^on l°r acquittal at the close of all the evidence, as required under Criminal Rule 29, 18 U.S.C.A.…