Legal Opinion

Holz v. North Pacific Insuarnce

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 27, 1988No. 21041-6-IPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScholfield, C.J.

North Pacific Insurance Co. (North Pacific) appeals from the trial court's decision that an exclusionary clause in a policy issued by North Pacific to plaintiff Holz was, as applied to Holz, in violation of public policy and RCW 48.22.030. We reverse.

Facts

North Pacific issued a personal auto policy to insured, Gary Holz, for the policy period October 16, 1984, through April 16, 1985, with $60,000 liability coverage, $10,000 personal injury protection coverage, and $60,000 underinsured motorist coverage. The one policy listed a 1973 Chevrolet with a camper, a 1976 Datsun, and a 1973 Dodge…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Britton v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Millers Casualty Insurance Co. of Texas v. BriggsWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Bates v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. VillicanaIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Newkirk v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Jain v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Jain v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API