Holz v. North Pacific Insuarnce
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtScholfield, C.J.
North Pacific Insurance Co. (North Pacific) appeals from the trial court's decision that an exclusionary clause in a policy issued by North Pacific to plaintiff Holz was, as applied to Holz, in violation of public policy and RCW 48.22.030. We reverse.
Facts
North Pacific issued a personal auto policy to insured, Gary Holz, for the policy period October 16, 1984, through April 16, 1985, with $60,000 liability coverage, $10,000 personal injury protection coverage, and $60,000 underinsured motorist coverage. The one policy listed a 1973 Chevrolet with a camper, a 1976 Datsun, and a 1973 Dodge…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Britton v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Millers Casualty Insurance Co. of Texas v. BriggsWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Bates v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
3Cited by11 opinions
- Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. VillicanaIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Newkirk v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Jain v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Jain v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.