Legal Opinion
Paolangeli v. Sopp
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 29, 1989PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Robert S. Rose, J.
In this action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, plaintiff moves for an order permitting him to file nunc pro tune the affidavit of service of the notice of mechanic’s lien required by sections 11 and 11-b of the Lien Law. Plaintiff filed the notice of his lien against property owned by defendant on December 16, 1988, served the notice upon defendant on December 17, 1988, but then failed to file proof of that service within the 35 days required by the Lien Law. Plaintiff argues that the failure to timely file such proof is a procedural irregularity that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Contelmo's Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. J & J Milano, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Modular Steel System, Inc. v. Avlis Contracting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Andrews v. Village of SherburneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Blackman-Shapiro Co. v. SalzbergCity of New York Municipal Court · 1957
- Hanson Heating & Plumbing, Inc. v. StoutNew York Supreme Court · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Lionel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Podolsky v. Narnoc Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Murphy Construction Corp. v. MorrisseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Klein v. Civale & Trovato, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Hui's Realty, Inc. v. Transcontinental Construction Services Ltd.New York Supreme Court · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.