Legal Opinion
Blackman-Shapiro Co. v. Salzberg
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided December 11, 1957PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. Irwin Shapiro, J.
This is a motion by the defendants for an order under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss both causes of action in the complaint upon the ground that they fail to state facts sufficient to constitute causes of action.
The first cause of action is to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, and the second cause of action is to recover for goods sold and delivered.
The defendants contend that the first cause of action is fatally defective because the notice of mechanic’s lien fails to comply with subdivision 7 of section 9 of the Lien Law in that it does not sufficiently describe the property…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Toop v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Pascual v. Greenleaf Park Land Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Woolf v. SchaeferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Gold v. Frank Teicher, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Jannotta v. Noslac Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McIntire & Quiros of Colo. v. Westinghouse Cr. Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1978
- Paolangeli v. SoppNew York Supreme Court · 1989
- Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. Western Seed Production Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Corina Associates, Inc. v. McManus, Longe, Brockwehl, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- MacQuesten General Contracting, Inc. v. HCE, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.