Legal Opinion

People v. Cole

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 5, 1989No. 87SA293PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROVIRA, Justice.

The People challenge the trial court’s order granting the defendant a new trial on the grounds that he did not receive effective assistance of counsel. 1 Because the record supports the trial court’s ruling, we affirm.

I

Defendant, Henry R. Cole, was charged with felony theft and forgery arising from a transaction between Cole and the Cripple Creek-Victor School District (school district). Cole was an insurance agent in Cripple Creek, Colorado, and was affiliated with Advantage II, a licensed insurance agency in Colorado Springs, Colorado.

In July 1984, Cole persuaded the school…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. People v. PozoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  4. People v. NormanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  5. People v. OliverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. TemplinUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Ardolino v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  3. Bowers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  4. Davis v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  5. People v. BlehmSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API