Ardolino v. People
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Coats
John Ardolino petitioned for review of the unpublished court of appeals' decision upholding the denial of his motion for postcon-viction relief. The district court determined, without a hearing, that Ardolino's counsel had not been ineffective both because his representation did not fall outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance and because any errors made by his counsel did not result in prejudice to his case. Because we find that the motion, files, and record in the case were insufficient to establish either that the acts and omissions of counsel identified by the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Massaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- People v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Davis v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- Hagos v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
- People v. KellingColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. OsorioColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. DuranColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- People v. GriffinColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.