Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Wallace

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 15, 1883PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Howard, Circuit Court. AotioN of REPLEVIN. There was a judgment upon á verdict for plaintiff. Defendant appeals. The facts involved in the questions ruled by the court are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

I. The plaintiff claims the property involved in this suit as the widow of Henry Wallace, on the ground that . 1. evidence: erroiMvitíioui prejudice. it was exempt from execution, and by the law 1 5 J was se^ aPai’t as her property. Defendant claims that ]ie js ¡awfui owner of the property. A copy from the records of a county in Wisconsin, showing plaintiff’s marriage to Henry Wallace, was admitted in evidence, against defendant’s objection that it was not sufficiently authenticated. The objection is renewed in this court. We waive the questions discussed under this point, for the reason that…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Blunck v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Witmer v. District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  3. Wilson v. FindleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  4. Whipple v. PreeceUtah Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Stewart v. WildSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API