Legal Opinion

Seattle Land & Improvement Co. v. Blum

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1913No. 10398PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered March 16,1912, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, dismissing an action to quiet title.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the plaintiff’s second amended complaint and dismissing the action. The action was dismissed after the plaintiff had elected to stand upon its pleading. The complaint, after alleging the appellant’s corporate existence and the payment of its last annual license tax, avers that, on November 15, 1902, and for several years prior and subsequent thereto, one Blinn S. Bryant, as the minor heir of his mother, was the owner in fee of the real property in controversy; that he attained his majority on the 29th day of October, 1909; that on the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Meade v. FrenchWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Stout v. MerrillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  3. Suell v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. State ex rel. Abbott v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Hoffman v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blaine County Bank v. NobleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Smith v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Denney v. AkersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. State Ex Rel. Wenatchee Etc. Dist. v. BankerWashington Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API