Legal Opinion
City of New Ulm v. Schultz
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 30, 1984No. C3-84-566, C5-84-567PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
356 N.W.2d 846 (1984)
CITY OF NEW ULM, petitioner, Respondent,
v.
Arthur W. SCHULTZ, et al., Appellants,
Northern State Power Company et al., Defendants.
CITY OF NEW ULM, petitioner, Respondent,
v.
Harry N. SOMSEN, Jr., et al., Defendants,
Robert W. Haubrich, et al., Appellants.
Nos. C3-84-566, C5-84-567.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
October 30, 1984.
William S. Rosen, St. Paul, for Schultz, et al. and Haubrich.
Hugh T. Nierengarten, New Ulm, for City of New Ulm.
Heard, considered and decided by FOLEY, P.J., and RANDALL and CRIPPEN, JJ.
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
The City of New Ulm petitioned for the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- HOUSING & REDEVEL. AUTHOR. OF MINNEAPOLIS v. Mpls. Metropolitan Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- State v. PahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- County of Blue Earth v. StauffenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Northern States Power Co. v. OslundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Cooperative Power Ass'n v. EatonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- HTK Management, L.L.C. v. Seattle Popular Monorail AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Htk Management v. Seattle Monorail Auth.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- City of Willmar v. KvamCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009