Legal Opinion
Haag v. Barnes
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 18, 1961PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.
This'appeal is-concerned with the effect in New York of an agreement made in another State for the support of a child horn out of wedlock. ' • '
' The complainant Dorothy Haag alleges that in 1947 she moved from Minnesota "and took'up residence in New-York City and that since then she has been 'a resident of this -State. The defend*557ant Norman Barnes, on the other hand, is now and was, during the period involved in this litigation, a resident of Illinois.
According to the statements contained in the complainant’s affidavits, she met the defendant in the spring of 1954 in New York. She was a law…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Auten v. AutenNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Mertz v. MertzNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Rubin v. Irving Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
- F. A. Straus & Co. v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Matter of Allstate Ins. Co.(stolarz-Njm)New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & StolarzNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Findley v. Blinken (In Re Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos Litigation)District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Walter E. Heller & Co. v. Video Innovations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.