Legal Opinion
Morici v. Jarvie
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 31, 1950PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The judgment in this case was rendered upon the report of a state referee. The defendants Jarvie duly filed an appeal accompanied by a request for a finding and a draft finding. On motion of the plaintiff the request for a finding was stricken out on the ground that no finding was necessary or *371proper in this case. See Walz v. Bennett, 95 Conn. 537, 540, 111 A. 834; Bassett v. Merchants Trust Co., 118 Conn. 586, 599, 173 A. 777; Dion v. Dion, 128 Conn. 416, 417, 23 A. 2d 314. On the same day the motion was granted, the defendants sought permission to file assignments of error and two days…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dion v. DionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Bassett v. Merchants Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Walz v. BennettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. IllySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
- Forbes v. Town of OrangeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Giordano Construction Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Georges v. OB-GYN Services, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2020