Humphrey v. WIXT News Ch. 9
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (William R. Roy, J.), entered December 9, 2003. The order denied plaintiffs motion for a default judgment and granted defendant’s motion for an order compelling plaintiff to accept defendant’s answer.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiffs motion for a default judgment and granting the motion of defendant for an order compelling plaintiff to accept its late answer (see CPLR 3012 [d];…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lichtman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Saunders v. County of WashingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Better v. Town of SchodackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Cleary v. East Syracuse-Minoa Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Goracy v. Burns, Brooks & McNeilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by2 opinions
- Case v. Cayuga CountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Petrosino v. PetrosinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005