Legal Opinion

Yost v. American Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1878PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to TVayne. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.

' Suit was brought to recover the amount claimed to be due March 1st, 1877, upon an installment note given February 17th, 1875, by Tost to the insurance company for a policy of insurance issued on that day. Judgment was recovered upon the note by the insurance company in justice’s court which, upon certiorari to the circuit, was affirmed. The case comes here upon error.

The facts were agreed upon, and are as follows:

First. The plaintiff is an insurance company, organized under the laws of the_ State of Illinois, and now existing and doing business in that State. _

_ Second. In 1870 this company…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clark v. BabcockMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Friedland v. McNeilMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Phenix Insurance v. TomlinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. St. Paul F. & M. Ins. v. ColemanSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1889
  3. Barnes v. Continental InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Equitable Insurance Co. v. HarveyTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Phenix Insurance v. RollinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API