Legal Opinion

Phenix Insurance v. Tomlinson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1890No. 14,412PublishedCited by 36 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— The complaint of the appellee alleges that the appellant issued to him a policy of insurance covering a period of five years; that in payment of the premium the appellee gave the appellant $9.73 in money, and executed a promissory note for $16.39; that the property insured was destroyed by fire on the first day of August, 1887; that immediately thereafter he gave the appellant due notice of the *85loss, and that the appellee performed all of the conditions of the contract on his part. The averment of performance is, however, qualified by specific allegations, which read thus : “ And the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Titus v. . Glens Falls Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Insurance Co. v. EgglestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Klein v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Willcuts v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Standley v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Continental Insurance v. VanlueIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Lime City Building, Loan & Savings Ass'n v. BlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Aetna Life Insurance v. FallowTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Replogle v. American InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Michigan Mutual Life Insurance v. CusterIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API