Clark v. Babcock
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Bay Circuit. The nature of the case and the facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Campbell, Ch. J.
Babcock sued Clark as his lessee, for rent. The defense set up by way of recoupment, was under a claim for damages, partly for delay in getting the property in condition for profitable use, and partly for expenses in repairs.
The lease, dated February 16, 1869, but covering a term of one year from February 1, 1869, demised a “steam saw-mill and salt-works ” and the lands thereunto belonging and appertaining, described in full, with a reservation of certain houses and premises not used for -business. Upon notice to be given on or before October 1, 1869 (which was actually…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Clifton v. MontagueWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
- Yost v. American InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Friedland v. McNeilMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Jones v. Crawford County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- Morton v. HanesMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.