Legal Opinion

McGinnis v. Taitano

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided April 20, 1998No. Civ.A. 3:96CV-261-SPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SIMPSON, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the court on motion of the plaintiff, Sean V. McGinnis (“McGin-nis”), for an order in limine precluding the defendant from introducing evidence of collateral source payments in the trial of this matter. On January 30, 1998 the court granted the unopposed motion (DN 111). Subsequently, the defendant, Raymond A. Taitano (“Taitano”), moved to vacate the order and for leave to belatedly file a response in opposition to the motion. Trial of this matter was continued due to the illness of McGinnis. The court determined that, in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Eichel v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Foster v. LeggettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1972
  5. Wessling v. ParisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Monumental Life Insurance v. Nationwide Retirement Solutions, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2003
  2. Custom Products, Inc. v. Fluor Daniel Canada, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2003
  3. Triplett v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2006
  4. Schall v. Suzuki Motor of America, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2019
  5. Shadd v. Daimler North America CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API